BEST GAMES

Friday, June 21, 2013

EFFECTIVENESS OF LAWS PROHIBITING SEX SELECTIVE ABORTIONS IN CURBING



EFFECTIVENESS  OF  LAWS  PROHIBITING  SEX SELECTIVE  ABORTIONS  IN  CURBING
FEMALE  FOETICIDE  IN  INDIA

 

 

 

 

Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the
requirements for the award of degree of




 

 

 

 

SUPERVISED BY                                   SUBMITTED BY

DR. C.R. Jilova                                                 Manjit

Assistant Professor                                           

Department of Law                                            Ref.No.

Kurukshetra University

Kurukshetra

 


 

 

DIRECTORATE OF DISTANCE EDUCATION

KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY, KURUKSHETRA

2012-2013


DIRECTORATE OF DISTANCE EDUCATION

       KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY, KURUKSHETRA

 


 

Dr. C.R. Jilova                                           Department of law

Assistant Professor                                     Kurukshetra University

                                                                      Kurukshetra

 

 

 

 

 

SUPERVISOR’S CERTIFICATE

 

Certified that Manjit bearning Ref. No.  in the session 2012-2013 has completed his dissertation entitled “Effectivess of Laws  Prohibiting Sex Selective Abortions in Curbing Female Foeticide in India” under my supervision and guidance. The work is fit for submission and evaluation I wish her all sucess in her life.

 

 

 

 

Dated............                                                       Dr. C.R. Jilova

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




 

 

 


Declaration


 

 

I, MANJIT, do hereby declare that the present dissertation entitled Effectiveness of Laws Prohibiting Sex  Selective Abortions in Curbing Female Foeticide in India has  been prepared by me on the basis of original research and has not been submitted or published in part or full to any other institution or university for any other purpose.

 

 

 

 

Dated..............                                                        (Manjit) 

                                                                                                      

Kurukeshtra University

Kurukeshtra (Harayana)

 


 


Preface


 

The last couple of decades have seen the girl child vanishing at such rapid rate that we are witnessing the phenomenon of the ‘missing girls’. The result of Census of 2001 and 2011(provisionl) which highlighted this disturbing trend, made the focus on the Child Sex Ratio (CSR) most important and urgent. The usual explanations of ‘cultural biases’ have been found to be both simplistic as well as inadequate.

Advancement in medical technology has resulted in development of techniques of sex determination and sex selection which have further deepened the crisis by providing access to methods for selective abortions of female foetuses. Female foeticide has now replaced female infanticide and has become an instrument of causing death of the unborn girls.

Keeping all this in view, the present dissertation makes an endeavour to analyse the causes for growth of female foeticide in India, to analyse and evaluate the legal provisions regarding sex selective abortions, to study the effectiveness of such laws in curbing the practice of female foeticide and to analyse the judicial response towards the problem.

I have attempted to summarise neatly, to provide clear detailed and indepth analysis of the various reports and data to expose and demonstrate that the phenomenon of selective abortions of female fetuses is widespread. It is all pervasive and does not know the class, creed, religion, urban or rural divides. The analysis of the statistics also reveals that the wide spread phenomenon has not been curbed by the existing legislations and the judicial response remains a mixed bag.

The whole dissertation is divided into seven chapters covering various aspects of female foeticide from causes, legal provisions, judicial dimensions to effectiveness of laws, consequences and suggestions for curbing the menace of female foeticide. The recent case laws and developments have also been discussed.

I am amply rewarded by the rich experience and knowledge gathered during the research. Any mistake committed in this dissertation is deeply regretted.

MANJIT


acknowledgement


 

In bringing this work, the debt of gratitude that I owe are heavy and numerous. I wish to express my gratitude to one and all who helped me in one way or other in the completion of this work. Some of them however deserve special mention.

First and foremost, I take this opportunity to express my deep sense of gratitude to my learned supervisor Dr. C.R, Jilova. I am deeply indebted to him for his superlative guidance, consultative criticism, infallible approach, inspirational words and valuable suggestions, which enabled me to carry out this work with high moral. He not only provided me his ablest experience and scholarly guidance but also allowed me a freehand in the treatment of the subject. I shall remain ever grateful for him.

I will ever remember that I am a product of a class,. batch 2012-2013, where existed equitable intellect that inspired me to constantly improve myself as a student of Law.

 

 

mANJIT


ABBREVIATIONS

 

 

AIR
-
All India Reporter
All ER
-
All England  Reporter
Cri LJ
-
Criminal Law Journal
(ed.)
-
Editor
Edn.
-
Edition
Et.al.
-
And  Others
FB
-
Full Bench
Ibid.
-
At the same place
ILR
-
Indian Law Reporter
Infra
-
Below
IPC
-
Indian Penal Code,1860
MTP Act
-
Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act,1971
P.
-
Page
PC & PNDT Act
-
Pre-Conception and Pre- Natal Diagnostic Tests Act,1994
SC
-
Supreme Court
SCC
-
Supreme Court Cases
SCR
-
Supreme Court Reporter
Sec.
-
Section
Supra
-
Above
US
-
United States of America
Vol.
-
Volume
WR (Cri)
-
Weekly Reports (Criminal)

 


List of cases


 

Ø  CEHAT v. Union of India, (2003) 8 SCC 398.

Ø  Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes [CEHAT] v. Union of India, AIR 2001 SC 2007.

Ø  Chetna, Legal Advisory W.C.D. Society v. Union of India, (1998) 2 SCC 158.

Ø  Criminal Writ Petition No. 945 of 2005, Vinod Soni & Anr v. Union of India, decided by Bombay High Court on 13.05.2005.

Ø  Deo v. Bolton,  41 USLW 4233 (1973).

Ø  Dr. Jacob George v. State of Kerala, (1994) 3 SCC 430.

Ø  Dr. Meenu Bhatia Prasad v. State, 2002 Cri. LJ 1674 (Del.).

Ø  Harpreet Singh v. State of H.P., 2009 Cri. LJ 3535 (Guj).

Ø  Madan Raj Bhandari v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1970 SC 436, 438.

Ø  Maideenkutty Haji v. Kunhikaya, AIR 1987 Ker 184 (FB)

Ø  Q.E. v. Ademma, 1886 ILR Mad 369.

Ø  Queen Empress v. Aruna Bewa, (1873) 19 WR (Cri) 230.

Ø  Rex v. Bourne, (1938) 3 All ER 615, 621.

Ø  Roe v. Wade, 410 US 113 (1973).

Ø  Sharif v. State of Orissa, 4996 Cri. LJ 2826 Ori.

Ø  State of Maharashtra v. Flora Santuno Kutino & Ors, 2007 Cri. LJ 2233 (Bom).

Ø  Suchitra Srivastava v. Chandigarh Administration, (2009) 9 SCC1.

Ø  Surendra Chauhan v. State of M.P., (2000) 4 SCC 110.

Ø  Voluntary Health Association of Punjab Vs. Union of India & Others

[Writ Petition (Civil) No. 349 of 2006] 4 March 2013

 

 

contents


 

Topic Approval Performa                                                                                         (i)

Certificate by Superviser                                                                                        (ii)

Declaration                                                                                                              (iii)

Preface                                                                                                                      (iv)

Acknowledgement                                                                                                     (v)

Abbreviations                                                                                                           (vi)

List of Cases                                                                                                            (vii)

 

 

Chapter-I :    Introduction                                                                        1-10

1.1 Introduction

1.2 Objectives

 

 

Chapter-2 :   Factors Responsible for Female

                        Foetcide                                                                                  11-27

2.1 Patriarchal Society

2.1.1 Son Preference

2.1.1 Daughter as a Burden

2.2 Two Child Family Norm

2.3 Misuse of Modern Medical Technology

2.4 Poor Enforcement of Laws

2.5 Consequences

 

 

Chapter 3 :    Legal Framework                                                           28-45

3.1 Provisions under Indian Penal Code, 1860

3.2 The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971

3.3 The Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of      Misuse) Act, 1994

3.4 The Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection Act, 1994)

3.4.1 Cognizance of Offence

3.4.2 Procedure for Prosecution

 

 

Chapter 4 :    Judicial Dimensions                                                       46-72

 

Chapter 5 :    Effectiveness of Laws in Curbing the

                        menace of female foeticide                                 73-102

Ø  5.1 Sex Ratio

Ø  5.2 Under Indian Penal Code

Ø  5.3 Under Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994

 

 

Chapter 6 :    conclusion and Suggestions                              103-111

 

 

Bibliography                                                                                                    i-v

 

 

Annexures                                                                                                       i-xlvi

Ø  Annexure I : Relevant Provisions of Indian Penal Code, 1860

Ø  Annexure II : Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971
alongwith Rules of 2003 and Forms

Ø  Annexure III : Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection Act, 1994) and Rules of 1996

No comments:

Post a Comment

Translate